Ian Thomas Malone

Monthly Archive: June 2026

Monday

29

June 2026

0

COMMENTS

‘Supergirl’ review: DC movies are back to being absolute garbage

Written by , Posted in Blog, Movie Reviews, Pop Culture

It can be easy to overcomplicate the troubles that have plagued film adaptations of DC Comics for the past decade. Zack Snyder’s Ayn Rand grimdark nonsense was never going to have a ton of mainstream appeal, but efforts to course-correct the franchise hit plenty of avoidable snags. Time and time again, these movies just weren’t very good.

James Gunn and Peter Safran were brought on not just to execute a soft reboot, but to make good movies. Last year’s Superman was a promising start for the new administration. Just a year later, the abominable Supergirl takes us right back to where we started.

A loose adaptation of Tom King’s Supergirl: Woman of Tomorrow, the film takes us away from Earth, as Kara Zor-El (Milly Alcock) tries to find her place in the universe after the destruction of her homeworld. Depressed and lonely, she spends her days drinking on planets in orbit around a red sun, which suppresses her powers, and her liver. Her libations are interrupted by a young girl Ruthye (Eve Ridley), whose family was murdered by Krem of the Yellow Hills (Matthias Schoenaerts). What started as a typical Western revenge story takes on additional emotional stakes as Krem shoots Krypto, Kara’s pupper and breakout star of Superman, with a poison dart, sending Kara scrambling to find the antidote within seventy-two hours.

Alcock is very comfortable in the lead role. The Supergirl character has been a challenge for DC Comics for decades. The CBS/CW Supergirl leaned into that all-American image that her cousin is known for. Director Craig Gillespie definitely doesn’t want Kara to be emulating a Boy Scout, but this version of the character doesn’t really have a ton of personality either. She’s an alcoholic. That’s pretty much her whole characterization.

We get some flashbacks of Krypton falling apart and the subsequent fall of Argo City that might appeal to hardcore fans, but the pieces don’t really come together in a way that doesn’t feel like a generic coming-of-age story bending over backwards to create stakes. This dynamic is on display most with how often the film needs to tell us what kind of sun each system has. Part of the problem with depicting the Superfam on screen is how ridiculously powerful they all are.

To create drama, people have to be able to challenge the hero. The film could achieve that either by having a really strong villain or a lot of Kryptonite. Krem is kind of a joke, a cookie-cutter comic book villain with no personality. Gillespie has zero ability to manage Kara’s power level, making the whole exercise into a pathetic plot device. She’s powered up when she needs to be, and screwed when the mechanics of narrative demand it.

For whatever reason, this film felt the need to include Lobo (Jason Momoa, who previously led the DCEU as Aquaman) in an extended cameo. The special effects are really bad. Part of what made Tom King’s original story work so well was that it felt like its own thing, with beautiful artwork from Bilqus Evely. This film looks like every other D-list superhero romp sitting at the bottom of the bargain bin.

Gillespie never really overcomes the original sin at the heart of this mess, an entire movie built around a single woman’s problem with drinking. It’s often said that alcohol is not a substitute for a personality. James Gunn might have kept that in mind with this woefully pathetic narrative.

We can certainly have sympathy for Kara’s plight, being one of the last survivors of the Kryptonian race. But beyond the generic hero’s call to “do good,” there’s just nothing really here to leave any kind of impression. The film desperately wants to lean into Kara as an anti-hero, but the film spends no time exploring her as a person.

That might not matter as much if this film had anything going for it. The action sequences are terrible. In some ways, it’s nice to have a superhero narrative where the world isn’t ending, but this third act is a joke. Even at a brisk 108 minutes, the whole thing feels way too long.

Much has been said over the past few years regarding how superhero films don’t really feel essential anymore. Genre fatigue is an easy excuse that doesn’t really apply here. Gunn built a lot of goodwill by delivering a strong Superman movie last year. For whatever reason, the new DCU chose to squander all of that with an absolute nothing of a feature. Supergirl is boring, ugly, and sloppy. Worst of all, I don’t think anyone can explain why it exists.

Friday

26

June 2026

1

COMMENTS

‘Jackass: Best and Last’ review: a clip show farewell to a fine American institution

Written by , Posted in Blog, Movie Reviews, Pop Culture

There’s a tendency by many aging comedians to proclaim that the humor that launched their careers could never be made today. Rainn Wilson recently attempted that train of thought with regard to The Office, as if a network comedy truly contained any material that wouldn’t be celebrated in Trump’s America. You never hear that kind of talk from the Jackass crew, who were successfully taken off the air after a campaign from right-wing culture warriors.

As 2022’s Jackass Forever showed us, some comedians can age with grace and maturity, even without straying too far from their roots. Jackass: Best and Last is a victory lap of sorts. The film is largely a clip show with highlights from the crew’s career, interspliced with some new footage featuring the newer crew that was introduced on the last go-around.

There’s something oddly charming about watching Johnny Knoxville, Steve-O, Chris Pontius, and the rest of the gang age. As Steve-O noted in the film, concussions hit differently when you’re pushing fifty. Knoxville took quite the hit back from a bull in Forever.

The crew is largely retired from dangerous stunts in Best and Last. “Best” and “Last” are distinctly separate concepts here. The best parts of the film come mostly through the “greatest hits” portion of the program, revisiting old memories. Aside from a few unaired clips, the romp down memory lane should be a little familiar to anyone going to a theater to watch the fifth Jackass movie.

The clip show dynamic is a little awkward at times, replaying moments that anyone could stream at home. The new cast is largely sidelined, with only Sean “Poopies” McInerney, Zach Holmes, and Jasper Dolphin getting much of anything to do. Rachel Wolfson and Compston “Dark Shark” Wilson (Jasper’s father) are nothing more than background characters.

Jackass: Forever had a degree of intimacy that could be explained by the pandemic, limited to closed sets without any stunts on location. Best and Last keeps them mostly confined to the Paramount Lot. Almost every new stunt is centered around butts or genitalia. Of the original main cast, only Ehren McGhehey and Dave England participate in any extreme stunts that any one of them might have attempted in an earlier era.

The OG crew has been through a lot. It’s understandable that they’d want to take a step away from the dangerous stuff, but that’s also why the new people were brought in. Jackass Forever proved that there was life left in this franchise. Best and Last doesn’t really try to be much of anything other than a victory lap.

There’s a lot of joy to be had watching a Jackass career retrospective that almost forgives the inherent laziness of the premise and the complete irrelevance of the newer crew. Bam Margera, who was fired from Forever, and Ryan Dunn, who passed away in 2011, feature prominently, giving an extra layer of emotional depth to the experience. Despite a joke by Pontius that he wasn’t in touch with his emotions, there’s a lot of obvious love here that radiates through the screen.

But there’s also the awkward reality that one new scene is nearly always followed by several romps that longtime fans have already seen. At one point, Steve-O announces that he wants to be the MVP of the movie, as other cast members laid better claim to films of Jackass past. This film has no MVP, or any interest in leaving a mark of its own.

Despite that, despite its lack of originality, despite the sidelining of nearly everyone who showed up to play in Forever, Best and Last somehow essentially achieves its objective. While several cast members muse to Knoxville that he’s threatened to end the franchise before, this does really feel like the end of the line. More than that, it feels like it should be the end. There’s nothing forward-thinking about any of these proceedings.

Jackass is not a sentimental franchise, but there’s something beautiful in watching all of this come together. The “manosphere” has warped the meaning of American masculinity, but the Jackass crew achieved something that the far-right could never imagine. They grew up.

Preston Lacy set up the waterworks late in the third act, as the crew talked about watching footage of themselves from decades past. Soft-spoken in his delivery, he merely says that he misses Ryan Dunn. You’re not supposed to cry watching something like Jackass, but it’s hard to make it through the credits without feeling the weight of a quarter-century of these antics coming to an end.

Jackass: Best and Last is not a great movie. At times, it feels more like a television special. Even if it may not impress, there’s a lot of joy to be had watching these guys bring their odyssey to a close. America has changed a lot since the early 2000s. The Jackass boys did too. The world may not have necessarily needed the last two installments, but there’s something wonderful to be found in the men they grew to be.

Friday

19

June 2026

0

COMMENTS

‘Toy Story 5’ Review: Plenty of Life Left in the Toy Box

Written by , Posted in Blog, Movie Reviews, Pop Culture

The generation that grew up with the original Toy Story is old enough to have plenty of kids of their own. Sixteen years ago, Toy Story 3 delivered one of the finest finales to a trilogy that cinema has ever seen. It’s a testament to the creative team that they’ve managed to produce two subsequent installments that stood on their own without diminishing the emotional impact of their predecessors.

Toy Story 5 arrives with a newfound sense of urgency. Screens dominate our lives, and destroy our attention span. The almighty algorithm poses a particular threat to children. Considering that the original Toy Story was made for the last generation of kids to grow up with memories of life before the predominance of the internet, it’s only fitting that the gang would have some thoughts on the technology that we’re all pretty sure is ruining our lives.

The fifth film takes place two years after the events of Toy Story 4. Bonnie (Scarlett Spears, taking over for Madeline McGraw) still loves her toys, but her classmates are all obsessed with tablets. Hoping to make it easier for Bonnie to make a friend, her parents purchase a Lilypad (Greta Lee), known as Lily. Having seen the effects of screen use on the neighborhood, Jessie (Joan Cusack) and gang resolve to keep Bonnie away from the addictive allure of the tablet.

Toy Story 4 essentially justified its existence by serving as an extended character piece for Woody (Tom Hanks). The fifth movie takes the same approach, centering Jessie as the new lead. Director Andrew Stanton manages to revisit some of Jessie’s arc from Toy Story 2 without totally cribbing its emotional beats. Much of the drama stems from Bonnie attempting to befriend a group of mean girls who dislike her youthful energy, stoking Jessie’s long-held fear of abandonment.

The pivot toward Jessie gives the franchise a breath of fresh air, only made a little awkward by the perpetual presence of the character that we spent the last film saying goodbye to. Woody has been aged by his years in the wild, best exemplified by the bald spot on his head that the writers think is absolutely hilarious. Sadly absent from this film are the many quips usually allotted to the supporting players.

Many franchises have successfully pivoted away from their original lead. Films like Blade Runner: 2049 and Spider-Man: No Way Home managed to incorporate legacy characters quite well, usually reserving them for the third act. Here, Woody enters the narrative fairly early on. Neither Woody nor Buzz Lightyear (Tim Allen) gets a lot to do. Particularly in the case of Woody, his presence can be distracting at times, leading to a natural feeling that he’d make more of an impact than he really delivers.

Toy Story 3 had a lot of big swings. This film largely plays it safe. The creatively ambitious move would have been to either limit the original sheriff to a cameo, or cut him entirely. Instead, Woody lingers, essentially boxing out the rest of the original supporting players. Woody might sell more toys than Rex, Hamm, Slinky Dog, or the Potato Heads, but he had his time. Part of a great goodbye involves not saying hello basically ten minutes later.

That sense of narrative laziness also extends to the whole tablet plot. The film does have a few sequences showing the mindlessness of doom-scrolling. It’s uncomfortable at times to watch if you’re an adult who wonders if you spend too much time on your phone (you probably do).

Pixar movies usually go straight for the heartstrings, unafraid to showcase the big feelings for all to see. Randy Newman’s iconic “Strange Things” was a wake-up call to Woody in the first movie about the realities of being replaced. Jessie went through the same stuff in the sequel. Stanton’s first Pixar film, Finding Nemo, went for broke in the first five minutes, killing off Nemo’s mother immediately. Pixar doesn’t play around with emotion.

Toy Story 5 does not approach the dangers of screen addiction with that same sense of determination. We see Bonnie going through it a bit, but the film does not attempt to make screens the enemy. One look at Disney+ can show us why, but Pixar is also the same company that produced the excellent Marxist primer A Bug’s Life, which taught countless young people how to overthrow the grasshopper bourgeoisie. Toy Story 5 is clearly done with the socialism.

The voice acting is mostly solid. There’s no getting away from the fact that Allen, Hanks, and Cusack are all a lot older than they were when these movies started, but only Allen is noticeably subdued in his delivery. The film does lean into the physical age of its toy characters at times, offering some compelling commentary on learning to accept the passage of time.

Toy Story 5 is in many ways an improvement over its immediate predecessor, especially for those of us who thought it was a little childish of Woody to peace out when he wasn’t the favorite toy anymore. Stanton gives Jessie the payoff many of us have been waiting for. The film manages to be a worthy installment in the franchise without feeling the need to try to top the emotional heights of its predecessors. It’s not the most revolutionary experience on the planet, but it’s first-class entertainment for all ages to enjoy at the theater.

Monday

15

June 2026

0

COMMENTS

Classic Film: Paris is Burning

Written by , Posted in Blog, Movie Reviews, Pop Culture

One of the harder parts about growing older as an LGBTQ person is the realization that the better tomorrow that was promised isn’t exactly coming. The 2015 Supreme Court decision Obergefell v. Hodges was supposed to turn the page on all the homophobic rhetoric that basks in this nation’s culture. Instead, we got a wave of anti-trans legislation and lobbying to roll back gay marriage that continues to this day.

The 1990 landmark documentary Paris is Burning remains an invaluable resource in the queer liberation movement. Set against the backdrop of New York’s ball culture, the film chronicles a diverse group of performers from a few of the “houses” that serve as found families for those who were rejected by their biological parents. Twenty-five years before the mainstream media treated Caitlyn Jenner’s coming out as a “Book of Genesis” style origin story for an entire group of people, plenty of trans folk found community amongst each other.

Director Jennie Livingston presents an easily accessible portrait of ball culture and its origins. The footage captures the larger-than-life feel of walking the runway, the energy in the room radiating through the screen. As many of the interviewees said, ballroom is all they have.

Many of the subjects had grand aspirations for careers in the arts. While performers like Madonna made millions appropriating dance moves such as voguing from ballroom culture, the originators were stuck on the fringes, a plastic trophy serving as the only real acknowledgement of their achievements. The outside world still has its limits for trans folk, especially women of color, but inside the ballroom, they could be anything.

Livingston’s work is inherently bleak at times, filmed in the middle of the AIDS crisis and centered on one of the most impoverished groups in the nation. That dread doesn’t really come across, even with subjects like Venus Xtravaganza, who was murdered before the conclusion of the documentary, a crime that remains unsolved. Their lives are more challenging than most, in a country hellbent on keeping trans people down, but they still find the joy in life.

The most powerful moment in the film comes from subject Dorian Corey, speaking on the nature of activism. Her statement, “You don’t have to bend the world. I think it’s better to just enjoy it,” is an important thing to keep in mind for plenty of trans people trying to survive in modern America.

It’s hard to wake up in an unjust world. Nobody wants to be told not to fight so hard for a better tomorrow. But tomorrow is coming regardless. The fact that it may not look pretty isn’t an excuse not to go out and find the joy where you can.

There can be a certain frustration watching Paris is Burning 36 years later, watching many of the same realities afflict the LGBTQ community. Those doors that the ballroom queens couldn’t kick down are still inaccessible to all but a handful of people. Progress has been made. AIDS, which took the lives of many of the film’s subjects, is no longer a death sentence.

The visibility question is another point that the world seems unwilling to grapple with. What is the use-value of visibility? Trans people existed in the 80s, as the film eloquently portrays.

America today still acts as if trans people are some new, recent thing. Paris is Burning showed full, vibrant communities, decades ago. The world just didn’t want to listen. A disgusting number of states are passing laws trying to pull the wool over the eyes of their own citizens, trying to pretend like the stuff portrayed in this documentary hasn’t always been around.

Like many of the subjects of the film, today’s LGBTQ community may not live long enough to see true equality obtained. That’s a depressing thought to sit with, until you consider how much progress we have made, how much joy there is to be had, if you’re willing to stand up and stand out in a world that doesn’t necessarily want you around.

Paris is Burning is a timeless reminder to have a good time as civilization crumbles all around us. Trans people may never achieve true liberation. That’s no excuse not to have fun along the way.

Monday

15

June 2026

0

COMMENTS

Classic Film: Wild at Heart

Written by , Posted in Blog, Movie Reviews

The timelessness of The Wizard of Oz is not a particularly complex notion. Judy Garland’s performance as Dorothy is eminently relatable across generations. We all want to feel at home, whether that’s a physical place, or in the arms of a man who talks like he’s doing an Elvis impersonation.

David Lynch’s 1990 film Wild at Heart is an unwieldy homage to one of the crown jewels of cinema. Swapping out for Dorothy and co. are Lula Fortune (Laura Dern) and Sailor Ripley (Nicolas Cage), two young people hopelessly in love. Sailor is sentenced to jail for five years after killing an assailant who attacked them with a knife, hired by Lula’s mother, Marietta (Diane Ladd). The two resume their romance after Sailor gets out, breaking his parole with a road trip to California.

The film finds its Lynchian weirdness on the road, with plenty of surrealistic visuals to keep Lula and Sailor company on the way to California. Not content to see her daughter run off, Marietta sends her boyfriends Johnnie Farragut (Harry Dean Stanton), a private detective, and Marcello Santos (J.E. Freeman), a gangster, after them. To make money for the trip, Sailor links up with unhinged criminal Bobby Peru (Willem Dafoe) for a robbery, one of many questionable decisions he makes along the journey.

Wild at Heart is a beautiful film to look at. The cinematography is top-notch. Lynch is clearly having the time of his life, supplementing the eerie road imagery with spooky visuals of his own. Dern brings an infectious chemistry to Lula, commanding every scene, sometimes with a single facial expression.

Part Wizard of Oz homage, part tribute to soap opera melodramatics, Lynch never really figures out how to tackle his adaptation of Barry Gifford’s novel of the same name. The screenplay is a mess. Dern and Cage both show up to play, but they’re rarely given anything to work with. They carry a few scenes on chemistry alone, but it’s hard to shake the feeling that neither really understands what their director is going for.

Lynch has a lot of interest in the scenery, but he doesn’t explore his characters at all. We learn almost nothing about Lula or Sailor, a dynamic that grows tiresome across the film’s unwieldy 124-minute runtime. Lynch’s preoccupation with violence doesn’t deliver the expected shock value. Often, it just feels like he’s being opaque for the sake of being opaque.

Oddly enough, having done little to earn such dramatic payoff, Lynch largely sticks the landing. The third act has a lot to say about the power of love to cut through life’s endless noise, a fitting dynamic for a film that’s mostly parlor tricks from a man capable of better. He leans on The Wizard of Oz a little too much for any of this to be particularly impressive, but Lynch almost makes up for his work’s inexplicable mundaneness.

Wild at Heart won the Palme d’Or at the 1990 Cannes Film Festival, despite being met with loud boos at its premiere. Maybe those boos came from pearl-clutchers who objected to the film’s graphic violence and sexual content. Maybe they were just very bored.

There is some joy to be had watching the two lovebirds go at it, despite everything that life throws at them. Time demands a lot from us. True love can still win out. It’s never too late to fight for another tomorrow.

Part of what makes David Lynch so iconic is his ability to create such singular worlds. Wild at Heart has a script that was in desperate need of additional work. The end result is such a half-baked experience, especially when compared to the rest of his filmography. Despite all that, even though this movie is not particularly good, Lynch’s effort is hard to get out of your head. Even in failure, he crafted something worth watching.

Monday

1

June 2026

0

COMMENTS

‘I Love Boosters’ review: capitalism meets its surrealist match

Written by , Posted in Blog, Movie Reviews, Pop Culture

The past few years have taught a lot of Americans about the levers of capitalism that have exploited the working class since the dawn of time. The idea of hard work being all you need for success is practically the stuff of fairy tales. People have caught on to the reality that billionaires rarely achieve such status by playing by the rules.

Boots Riley’s absurdist crime comedy I Love Boosters takes aim at the business practices of the fashion industry. Corvette (Keke Palmer), Sade (Naomi Ackie), and Mariah (Taylour Paige) are three “boosters,” people who shoplift high-end clothing to resell at a discount on the black market. Living out of a closed-down fast-food chicken restaurant, their favorite target is the Metro Designers chain, owned by Christie Smith (Demi Moore), an idol of Corvette’s.

Christie, an outspoken personality on social media, exploits her workers both domestically and abroad. Metro Designers specializes in monochrome collections, which store employees are expected to purchase for themselves each season when the stores completely rebrand to a new color. Working conditions at her Chinese sweatshop are inhumane. One of the workers, Jianhu (Poppy Liu) started raiding Metro Designers’ shops after her aunt died and her mother got cancer from the sandblasting at Christie’s shops.

Riley’s work reaches new levels of surrealism when the Boosters team up with Jianhu, who is armed with a portable transportation device that’s also capable of deconstruction and situational acceleration, riffing on Marx’s theory of dialectical materialism. The transporter devices are quite amusing, if not a little stifling amidst everything else going on. When it’s not busy diving into heavy Marxism, the narrative makes space for more surface-level critiques in the form of Dr. Jack (Don Cheadle), who runs a classic pyramid scheme called Friends being Friendly.

There is a lot going on in I Love Boosters. Riley’s attention to style is perpetually on display, particularly the set design. Christie’s office, built on an incline, helps set the tone for the film’s lack of subtlety. The score, performed by Tune-Yards, operates on the same wavelength as Riley’s frantic sense of pacing.

The three leading women have a natural sense of chemistry. We don’t learn a ton about any of them as people. Corvette gets the most character development, especially opposite a mysterious man with a pinky ring (LaKeith Stanfield) but Riley is pretty content to let things play out as a fairly standard revenge piece.  Moore and Cheadle showed up to play, while Will Poulter shines in a bit role as one of the store managers. Paige is the real comedic standout, constantly eliciting laughs through Mariah’s antics.

Riley’s worldbuilding is the key to the film’s success. Everything feels lived-in, fostering an inclusive atmosphere for the narrative’s ample humor. The dramatic tension rarely lets up, an exhausting 113-minute runtime that could probably have shaved ten minutes off.

The film wears its anti-capitalist message on its sleeve, but the substance of the story doesn’t go much deeper. There’s too much going on for Riley to really thoroughly explore any of his themes. Cheadle’s storyline doesn’t really receive enough attention to justify its place in the narrative.

Capitalism itself largely relies on people being too overwhelmed to process all of life’s own whiplash. Riley takes a lot of big swings with I Love Boosters. They don’t all land perfectly, but the space he created is so much fun to spend time in. The arts as a whole would be a lot healthier if more artists were given space to work their own magic like Riley.