Ian Thomas Malone

Monthly Archive: February 2026

Sunday

22

February 2026

3

COMMENTS

‘Wuthering Heights’ review: Brontë’s depth is thrown out the window in this substance-free adaptation

Written by , Posted in Blog, Movie Reviews, Pop Culture

There is no set formula for what makes a successful film adaptation of a literary classic. The closest thing we might get to a rubric lies in the essence of the source material. Wuthering Heights is one of the most imposing novels in the English canon, a brutally miserable text with practically no one to root for.

At its core, Emily Brontë’s only book is about the ramifications of generational trauma. Heathcliff arrives to the titular Wuthering Heights as an orphan boy, quickly becoming the favorite of his adoptive father, Mr Earnshaw. Earnshaw’s two biological children have polar opposite reactions to Heathcliff. Hindley Earnshaw is jealous of his new brother, while Catherine “Cathy” sees a new pet, and later, the love of her life.

The generational trauma in the text is set in motion after the death of Mr Earnshaw. Hindley and his new wife Frances hate Heathcliff, beating him and reducing his status to that of a servant. With Heathcliff’s prospects limited, particularly by the restrictions and cruelty of his adoptive brother, now the master of Wuthering Heights, Catherine turns to their neighbor, Edgar Linton, as a potential match.

Heathcliff never gets over his poor treatment by Hindley, or his rejection by Cathy. Cathy dies during childbirth about halfway through the novel. Its second half is entirely consumed with Heathcliff’s desire for vengeance upon the descendants of Hindley and Edgar, plus his own hated son, born of his perplexing and cruel marriage to Isabella Linton, Edgar’s sister.

Heathcliff knew only cruelty as a child. Whatever sympathies the reader might feel for him are gradually washed away through the course of the text, as Heathcliff doles out brutality in more than equal measure. Mostly through the novel’s narrator, Nelly Dean, Brontë makes clear that Heathcliff is not a figure to root for.

For her third feature, Emerald Fennell largely truncates the sprawling nature of Brontë’s work. There is no Hindley Earnshaw, or subsequent generation. The second half of the book is gone. The quotation marks placed around the title Wuthering Heights make clear that this is a very different adaptation of the seminal book.

Heathcliff (Jacob Elordi, with Owen Cooper portraying young Heathcliff) comes to Wuthering Heights in much the same way as the book. Only now, Mr Earnshaw (Martin Clunes) is the degenerate gambler who beats him. Cathy (Margot Robbie, with Charlotte Mellington portraying young Cathy) is now an only child, who gives Heathcliff his name as a mark of possession, her pet to endure the boredom of her unstimulating environment.

From a stylistic standpoint, Fennell marvelously captures the essence of the book. Wuthering Heights is an imposing, dreary structure out in the middle of nowhere. By comparison, the Linton’s Thrushcross Grange is a beacon of hope, brimming with life. The cinematography beautifully captures all of the characters’ natural feelings of isolation, alongside the foreboding sense of dread that lingers of every page of Brontë’s prose.

Robbie and Elordi are both cartoonishly miscast. Heathcliff is unambiguously dark-skinned in the book, contributing to his sense of othering. Elordi does his best to capture Heathcliff’s brutishness, but it’s not particularly convincing.

In the book, Cathy was eighteen when she died during childbirth. Robbie is quite a bit older. The film makes modest allowances for this discrepancy, once referring to Catherine as being as old as a spinster, but Fennell misses a key opportunity to explore how these age dynamics might play into her new version of why Catherine abandoned her true love.

Cathy and Heathcliff’s unresolved sexual tension is a vital throughline in the book. Cathy basically edges Heathcliff into oblivion. He never stops loving Cathy, yet treats her daughter, who has many of her features, with inexplicable cruelty.

Fennell has no interest in keeping Elordi and Robbie’s hands off each other. In doing so, she relents on the undercurrent powering much of the novel. What takes its place is largely the downfall of her film.

Brontë wrote Wuthering Heights with such intensity and fervor that it’s hard not to admire her work, even if you never want to read it again. Fennell reduces all of that to a mere matter of vibes. This film is all about the vibes.

To be clear, there’s a lot to like about Fennell’s sense of atmosphere. Every frame is full of meticulously structured imagery. It’s a beautiful film to look at. The music, with a score provided by Fennell regular Anthony Willis, and original songs by Charli XCX, is delightfully on point.

But there’s an emptiness of substance that Fennell struggles to shake. Edgar Linton (Shazad Latif) is reduced to nothing more than a patsy. Nelly (Hong Chau) is barely around at all, lacking the delectable nuance she wields throughout the text.

The biggest crime is Isabella Linton (Alison Oliver), whom Fennell treats as a complete joke. Isabella’s loveless marriage to Heathcliff is not the confusing tragedy of the text, but an outlet for BDSM humor. Heathcliff is let off the hook for his cruelty, a recurring theme for Fennell throughout her narrative.

Brontë does supply reasons to feel bad for Heathcliff in the text, but she never tries to carry water for her character. Heathcliff is a bad man who unquestionably becomes the primary antagonist of the book for its second half. Fennell isn’t really interested in exploring the nature of his descent into a monster so much as she wants to make excuses for him. Nothing in Fennell’s Wuthering Heights is ever Heathcliff’s fault.

The absence of characters like Nelly or Mr Lockwood to process the ramifications of Heathcliff and Cathy’s romance isn’t really satiated by anything else in the narrative to give meaning to all this constant heartache and turmoil. Fennell isn’t interested in generational trauma, that much is clear. What exactly is she interested in, besides horny people in the middle of nowhere, with nothing to obsess about but each other?

Wuthering Heights is a brutal read. Brontë’s work largely endures on the strength of her prose, and the gravity of her ideas. There’s so much depth to this book. It’s the kind of narrative that sticks with you, even if you didn’t like a single character.

Fennell’s work is a lewd, empty fever dream. There are a lot of attractive people being horrible to each other. Her technical skills as a filmmaker are on full display, a narrative as gorgeous as it is vacuous. Shallow should never be a word that comes to mind regarding the work of Emily Brontë.

Tuesday

17

February 2026

0

COMMENTS

‘The Secret Agent’ review: a powerful commentary on time and memory

Written by , Posted in Blog, Celebrity Apprentice, Movie Reviews

One of the great powers of film as a medium lies in its ability to capture mood. Film offers a narrow prism into its subjects’ lives, two hours against a whole existence. The saying that the journey is more important than the destination has become a bit of a cliché. Some subjects, particularly fascism, carry more weight from the perspective of the atmosphere.

The film The Secret Agent (Original Portuguese title: O Agente Secreto) beautifully captures the all-encompassing nature of a brutal dictatorship. The narrative follows Armando (Wagner Moura), a former professor on the run. Armando travels to Recife during the Carnival, where his son Fernando (Enzo Nunes) lives with his dead wife’s parents. Armando syncs up with a dissident network run by the elderly Dona Sebastiana (Tânia Maria), who connects him with a job at an identity card office, which gives him a chance to search for information on his dead mother.

Director Kleber Mendonça Filho crafts an exquisite portrait of 1970s Brazil and its all-encompassing paranoia. An open sequence centers on Armando filling up for gas outside the city. A dead body sits fifty feet from the gas station, barely covered with a piece of cardboard. The police soon arrive, not to investigate the corpse, but to shake Armando down for a “donation,” making their priorities clear.

Mendonça Filho presents his narrative with the trappings of a political thriller. Armando encounters a corrupt politician, Ghirotti (Luciano Chirolli), who hires cheap hitmen to kill him. While his son is desperate to see Jaws, Armando’s only consistent communication with family comes from meetings with his father-in-law at the movie theater where he works as a projectionist.

Moura puts forth a spectacular performance in the lead role. Armando has all the trappings of a classic 70s thriller protagonist, a calm demeanor with an understated sense of suavity. You feel Armando’s paranoia through every frame, an exhausted man with no choice but to keep going, impeccably easy to root for.

Mendonça Filho has a constant bag of tricks for his audience through the film’s imposing 161-minute runtime. There’s a subplot involving a severed leg that transforms into a surrealist sequence. Set against the backdrop of Carnival, Mendonça Filho throws constant atmospheric whiplash at his audience, forced to reckon with the reality that authoritarianism never takes a breather, even in moments of celebration.

The film further upends expectations with a time-jump to the present, where a student (Laura Lufési) is researching the underground movement that Armando was a part of. Just as Armando was trying to uncover information about his mother, researchers in the present day were trying to learn about his history. The cycle continued.

Thrillers often spend their whole runtime building tension for a dramatic payoff. Mendonça Filho is a master at tension, but his work looks beyond the kind of payoffs that film typically offers. You don’t need to see a man like Armando topple over a fascist regime to see the power in his story. History is rarely as neat as film often tries to make it out to be. The power of resistance is not always measured in success, but through the human heart’s refusal to bow down to tyranny.

The Secret Agent is often a challenging watch. Mendonça Filho’s sense of pacing occasionally edges his audience to the point of frustration, all in service to his powerful broader themes. History rarely leaves us with all the pieces. Some people want answers to the broader politics of the era, others just want to remember the summer blockbuster they enjoyed amidst the carnage.

Tuesday

3

February 2026

0

COMMENTS

‘The Muppet Show’ Review: The Perfect Antidote to 2026 America

Written by , Posted in Blog, Reviews, TV Reviews

In a world seemingly stuffed to the brim with remakes and reboots, the absence of The Muppets from the broader popular culture landscape has been one of the great travesties of the past fifteen years. Practically nothing has gone right for everyone’s favorite puppet ensemble since their 2011 comeback film, The Muppets. The removal of Muppet*Vision 3D from Disney’s Hollywood Studios serves as perhaps the best embodiment of Disney’s broader mismanagement of the franchise.

There is a joke that circulates around social media suggesting that The Muppets should lead a Pride & Prejudice adaptation, a concept that Brett Goldstein endorsed, a throwback to their 90s output such as The Muppet Christmas Carol and Muppet Treasure Island. The Muppets have deserved better than their recent treatment, including 2021’s meager Muppets Haunted Mansion special that robbed the troupe of their signature wit. In honor of the 50th anniversary of their most iconic program, Disney brought The Muppets back to basics with a special event, titled The Muppet Show.

The special quickly demonstrates the vitality of The Muppets after all these years. The gang hasn’t missed a beat. The skits are tight, and many of the jokes are a throwback to the more risqué humor that The Muppets leaned into, especially in the pre-Disney years.

Special guest star Sabrina Carpenter shows up ready to play. Carpenter’s banter with Miss Piggy is one of the highlights of the show. A former Disney Channel star, Carpenter shows off her acting chops, completely at ease within the gonzo world of The Muppets. Carpenter and Seth Rogen, who also executive-produced the special, get their moments to shine without taking the spotlight away from the real stars of the show, The Muppets themselves.

Longtime fans of The Muppet Show will find plenty to enjoy in the backstage chaos, a night of laughs that genuinely feels like the gang never left the theater. This special is a well-oiled machine that doesn’t rest on the laurels of nostalgia or celebrity. There’s so much obvious love that went into this show that it leaves you wanting a more permanent return.

Variety shows were all the rage on television back when The Muppet Show first aired in the 1970s. The format has struggled in the modern era, for many obvious reasons. A direct descendant of vaudeville, the blend of music and comedy that defines the variety show format doesn’t necessarily always produce the most memorable television. Like the decline of vaudeville, variety shows fell out of popularity when audiences received greater access to broader entertainment options.

As sacrosanct as it is to admit, the original Muppet Show was not exactly immune to criticisms that could be levied at the broader variety show format. If you watch a handful of episodes, especially those without the more iconic special guest stars, you’re bound to run into a few musical numbers that haven’t exactly stood the test of time. The revival of The Muppet Show manages to produce a few strong musical numbers, especially one performed by a criminally underutilized member of the troupe that comes completely out of left field, and probably shouldn’t work as well as it did.

The only sore spot throughout the 30-minute special is regrettably an important one. Matt Vogel took over as the performer for Kermit in 2017, replacing Steve Whitmire. Turnover is expected after fifty years, even before you consider the physical demands of puppeteering. Dave Goelz is the only performer in the special who worked on the original series.

Vogel’s voice just doesn’t have the right pitch for Kermit. It’s far too deep, unable to hit the necessary high spots for Kermit’s exasperation. Hearing Vogel speak reminds the audience of why he’s perfect for Big Bird, another top-tierrole that he inherited in 2018, but it doesn’t work here. Kermit is the anchor of The Muppets. For all the ways that this rendition of The Muppet Show is a perfect tribute to the original series, Vogel’s Kermit takes you out of the moment, reminding everyone that time does pass, even for The Muppets.

Kermit hardly ruins the experience, but it is an issue that should be addressed if The Muppet Show aims to be more than a one-off special, aspirations that the show not so subtly hints at, for good reason. The Muppet Show is more than a fantastic tribute. It’s proof of concept that this is where The Muppets belong. The world needs The Muppets. This special is a perfect testament to the vitality of these beloved pieces of felt. It’s so good to have them back.