Ian Thomas Malone

Monthly Archive: September 2025

Friday

26

September 2025

0

COMMENTS

‘One Battle After Another’ review: Anderson’s masterpiece is a strong contender for the best film of 2025

Written by , Posted in Blog, Movie Reviews

The work of Thomas Pynchon has always captured the zeitgeist of American culture through the most absurd lens possible, blending the eloquence of writers like Vladimir Nabokov with the gonzo realism of Hunter S. Thompson. Pynchon finds calm in the chaos, a rare talent that Paul Thomas Anderson has repeatedly demonstrated throughout his extensive career, particularly in his more sprawling epics such as Magnolia and There Will Be Blood.

Anderson has adapted Pynchon before, last in 2014’s Inherent Vice, an admirable adaptation of a late-stage effort from the reclusive author. With One Battle After Another, Anderson presents a loose take on Pynchon’s 1990 novel Vineland, which focused on Nixon-era underground activists coping with the realities of Reagan’s America. The overreaches of the DEA have been replaced with ICE, a timely modern touch that doesn’t sacrifice the atmosphere that Pynchon delicately crafted.

Bob Ferguson (Leonardo DiCaprio) is a somewhat hapless member of a radical far-left group known as the French 75, which uses guerrilla tactics to liberate immigrants and bomb courthouses and politicians’ offices. Bob’s partner, Perfidia Beverly Hills (Teyana Taylor) is a natural leader among the French 75, outgoing and relentlessly committed to the cause, a dynamic that puts strain on her relationship with Bob after they have a child.

Perfidia becomes entangled with Col. Steven Lockjaw (Sean Penn), who she first captures and teases while he’s in command of an immigrant detention facility. Aroused by her handling of him, Lockjaw becomes infatuated with Perfidia, eventually sleeping with her after he catches her planting a bomb in a courthouse. Lockjaw is being courted by the Christmas Adventures Club, a secret society of powerful white supremacists who take issue with his relationship with Perfidia, who’s eventually captured by the authorities, but escapes a cozy witness protection assignment set up by Lockjaw himself.

Sixteen years later, Bob is retired from his revolutionary days. His daughter Willa (Chase Infiniti) takes after her mother, whose past as a rat was kept from her. Willa trains in karate at the dojo of Sergio St. Carlos (Benicio del Toro), a softer-spoken member of the French 75.

The film’s primary action is set into motion when the Christmas Adventures Club begins its vetting of Lockjaw, who denies ever having been in an interracial relationship. Lockjaw hires a private investigator to track down Willa, whom he suspects might be his daughter, triggering the safety protocols of the French 75. Long-retired and addicted to substance abuse, Bob struggles with the number of passwords and codes required to engage with his old group, all while trying to protect his daughter and only family.

Anderson’s great triumph is the way he crafts a sweeping odyssey rooted in an intimate crime thriller. It’s a game of cat and mouse that feels like it completely captures the rot of this decrepit nation. Everything wrong with America is somehow encapsulated between an old racist and a middle-aged leftist burnout chasing each other around a tiny West Coast sanctuary city.

DiCaprio is not known for playing bums. Bob is not a hero. He’s not smart. His charm has faded, a sad burnout, left to raise his kid after the love of his life abandoned him. Bob is hardly the driving force of One Battle After Another, but Leo never lets the audience forget why he’s still one of the few legitimate stars left in the business. He’s not playing a particularly interesting or compelling man, and yet DiCaprio still manages to put forth one of the strongest performances of his career.

After the first act, which focuses on Taylor as the center of gravity, Penn and Infiniti provide most of the film’s emotional core. Lockjaw is a despicable scumbag, but Penn works his magic in a way that almost has you feeling sorry for this pathetic nothing of a racist. Lockjaw is a thoroughly Pynchonesque creation, an ugly creature who’s nevertheless quite captivating to watch.

Flanked on all sides by A-list talent, Infiniti makes the film her own. In many ways, she’s a Gen Z rebel without a cause, her DNA full of revolutionary sympathies repressed under the tutelage of a father who desperately wants his daughter to avoid that kind of life. Anyone who’s ever felt the inherent urge to belong to something bigger than themselves can find a kindred spirit in Willa.

The cinematography is simply delicious. Director of photography Michael Bauman did a fabulous job capturing the sprawling Californian landscape. Johnny Greenwood’s score often feels like a metronome guiding Anderson’s epic.

The 162-minute runtime never drags. Perhaps more impressive is the way that Anderson never exhausts his audience through many action sequences that never really let up. There’s almost no downtime in the film. Pynchon’s work is commonly exhausting. Even his shorter works, like The Crying of Lot 49, are complex puzzles bound to tire out their readers. Somehow, Anderson channels his muse perfectly without leaving viewers completely drained in the process.

Perhaps owing to its source material’s age, but Anderson manages to make a political film that feels prescient without being overly steeped in current events. Its subjects are not politically eloquent people. ICE’s overreaches have been an issue in this country since before Vineland was first published in 1990. The film is less an indictment of Trump than a scathing rebuke of everything wrong that’s happened to this nation since Reagan announced it was morning in America, ushering in the “Greed is Good” era that’s never really gone away.

One Battle After Another isn’t just Anderson’s best work since The Master. It’s a vital demonstration of Hollywood filmmaking as legitimate art. Anderson and Pynchon’s fingerprints are all over every minute of this feature, but it feels fresh and potent.

This film is something audiences have been starving for. Anderson isn’t playing safe with right-wing snowflakes, desperate to cancel anyone who dares to call out their bigoted nonsense. Neither does he throw about masturbatory red meat to a liberal audience bound to laugh as fools like Lockjaw.

It’s all Pynchon in a nutshell. It’s crazy. You never know what’s going to happen next, or how the characters will surprise you, but it’s all crafted with such obvious love and attention to detail.

Popular culture under late-stage capitalism is all about giving its audiences less for more. Everything is more expensive, and much of it is worse. Film studios are filling their feed troughs with AI slop that no one with half a brain would enjoy. Capitalism thrives when it’s able to mildly satiate its feeble consumer base, all too content with its substance-free diet.

That’s never been Pynchon’s jam or Anderson’s. Sitting in a movie theater, watching everything play out on a big screen, One Battle After Another reminds us of this medium’s innate ability to move people when studios get out of the way, get over their own egos, and let their talent cook. Anderson’s tour de force is easily one of the best films of the year.  The famously reclusive Pynchon would never do an interview to admit it, but it’s hard to believe he’s not smiling somewhere about how beautifully his work came to life.

Monday

22

September 2025

0

COMMENTS

‘Spinal Tap II: The End Continues’ review: a meager attempt at a sequel

Written by , Posted in Blog, Movie Reviews, Pop Culture

Comedy sequels are tricky for an obvious reason. Just because something was funny once doesn’t mean it’ll be funny again. In fact, if something was already once, that’s a decent sign that it won’t be funny again. In general, the laws of diminishing returns affect comedies way more than drama.

This is Spinal Tap is one of the most beloved comedies of all time. What began as a satire of the music industry eventually took on a life of its own, with numerous reunion concerts, television appearances, and a few albums since the film’s 1984 premiere. Somewhere along the way, the lines became blurred and Spinal Tap became something of a real band, a reality that defines and plagues the follow-up film.

This is Spinal Tap was an early entry in the mockumentary genre, but the film had a real plot and a real narrative. Director Rob Reiner crafted something that felt like an actual rock documentary while never losing sight of its purpose as a comedy. Band members like David St. Hubbins (Michael McKean) and Nigel Tufnel (Christopher Guest) thought they were cool, but Reiner made clear to the audience that these people were washed-up losers. The exploration of their humanity gave the film an endearing quality that greatly added to its legacy.

Spinal Tap II: The End Continues is much more like a straight concert documentary. The film reunites the main trio, St. Hubbins, Tufnel, and Derek Smalls (Harry Shearer) in New Orleans for a reunion in New Orleans, billed as their final show. The three have drifted apart in the past few decades, each pursuing other interests. St. Hubbins scores podcast music, Tufnel runs a guitar and cheese store, and Smalls operates a Museum of Glue. None of them has much affection for each other, a puzzling dynamic that remains underexplored throughout the narrative.

Much of the film centers around Tap practicing for their reunion show, jamming in a studio, mostly sitting in chairs. It’s kind of sweet, to a certain extent, watching old friends at it again after forty years. Guest in particular retains a healthy dose of that boyish charm he brought to Tufnel.

There are a few laughs to be found in the studio, particularly when it comes time to find a new drummer, a perilous task given the fate of all their other percussionists. The stagnancy drags. It’s neither funny nor particularly interesting to watch semi-pretend musicians rehearse for a semi-pretend concert. Against all odds, Reiner managed to make an 85-minute runtime feel like three hours, a painful slog that drags its way to the finish line.

Reiner, who reprises his role as fictional director Marty Di Bergi, seems quite bored throughout the endeavor, as does Guest, who struggles to muster up enthusiasm in many scenes past the first few minutes. This is Spinal Tap was Reiner’s first directorial effort. It’s understandable why he has such obvious love for the material, but that affection doesn’t translate well onto the finished product.

Two cameos from Paul McCartney and Elton John attempt to liven things up, while also highlighting a fundamental problem of the film. At one point during the original film, David gets angry when Spinal Tap is billed lower than a puppet show at a gig at an amusement park. Spinal Tap used to be pathetic. Now, musical icons want to play with them.

Spinal Tap’s extended victory tour would be more acceptable if this film had tried to include more actual jokes. There are a couple of gags here and there, but nowhere near enough to pad out a feature-length runtime.  The improv doesn’t work at all. McCartney, in particular, looks like a deer in the headlights when it comes to humor. Elton fares a bit better in a smaller appearance.

Did the world need another Spinal Tap film? No, but the music industry has changed quite a lot since we last checked in with the band. There was ample material to make a sequel. Reiner and crew just settled for the laziest path imaginable. There is some novelty in seeing them all on the big screen again, but this was a pathetic showing from the creative crew behind some of the greatest comedies of the past forty years. Everyone deserves better.

 

 

Wednesday

3

September 2025

0

COMMENTS

‘Downton Abbey: The Grand Finale’ review: a satisfying victory lap for the Crawley family

Written by , Posted in Blog, Downton Abbey, Movie Reviews, Pop Culture

Change has always been at the core of the Downton Abbey franchise. There is a certain natural contrast between its themes of navigating the post-Edwardian era and the reality that much of the best drama occurs within the trappings of that old world audiences know and love. After fifteen years, six television seasons, and three movies, the time has finally come to say goodbye, for presumably the last time.

Set at the beginning of the 1930s, not all that long after the events of the final season, Downton Abbey: The Grand Finale centers its narrative on Lady Mary (Michelle Dockery) as she assumes command of the estate. Lady Mary’s ascension has been a long time coming, first discussed in season four. The death of Lady Mary’s husband Matthew (Dan Stevens) upended both the planning for Downton’s future within the show, as well as the series itself, which had to work around Stevens’ unexpected departure.

For the second half of the series, Lady Mary spent much of her narrative consumed with new suitors. After spending most of seasons four and five caught between two men, writer/series creator Julian Fellowes threw a curveball at the tail end of season five with the introduction of Henry Talbot (Matthew Goode). Lady Mary and Henry enjoyed a truncated romance throughout much of season six before marrying at the tail end of the series.

There was always a certain irony in Mary ending up with a car enthusiast after her first husband perished in a car accident during the season three Christmas special, an event that spoiled many viewers’ holiday. Three movies in, one can’t shake the feeling that déjà vu occurred once again while casting Mary’s spouse. One might have thought that the most important consideration for picking Mary’s second husband would be availability for the films that were an open secret by the show’s final season.

Instead, Fellowes settled on Goode, a highly sought-after actor with a schedule far too busy to play arm candy to Lady Mary. In some ways, this ended up working out kind of well. Henry’s minuscule part in the first Downton Abbey film and complete omission from the second two films might be disappointing for those who enjoyed the awkward pairing of Mary and Henry, but his absence gave the films some natural drama missing from the show finale’s preoccupation with tying everything in a neat little bow.

The Grand Finale largely focuses its narrative on the fallout of Mary’s divorce from Henry. Banished from London society, Mary seeks solace in her familiar Yorkshire, which is not immune to snobbery of its own. Set not long after the events of Downton Abbey: A New Era, Lord Grantham (Hugh Bonneville) is still reeling from his mother’s death, unsure of his place in the world he’s given his life to preserving, resisting the gentle guidance of his wife Cora (Elizabeth McGovern) to relax in his old age.

Cora’s own mother passed away offscreen in between films. Expecting some of her inheritance to cover construction on the estate, Cora is shocked when her brother Harold Levinson (Paul Giamatti, reprising his role from the season four Christmas special) arrives in London with a poor financial outlook. Harold also brought his enigmatic financial advisor, Gus Sambrook (Alessandro Nivola), to explain his poor business dealings, which has been a recurring pattern for him since season four.

The final chapter has much more modest trappings than its cinematic predecessors. There’s no marquee event like a visit from the King or a mysterious French villa gifted to a dying octogenarian anchoring the narrative. Instead, Fellowes’ modest intentions serve as more of an extended episode of the series, a well-deserved victory lap.

Fellowes takes great care to ensure that each member of the franchise’s large ensemble gets a moment to shine. There are a few storylines that harken back to the show’s early days. Major events like World War I and the Spanish flu happened during the series, alongside more modest conflicts, like stomping out favoritism in the village Flower Show or whether a lady’s maid could still prepare a restorative broth. The Grand Finale manages to recapture some of the fun of the show’s early days as it wraps up storylines for over a dozen characters.

The shadow of the franchise’s matriarch and apex predator Violet Crawley looms large over the film. Maggie Smith is sorely missed. While nobody can replace her searing wit, Fellowes includes several tributes to the Dowager throughout the narrative. Fans of her frequent sparring with Isobel Crawley, the new Lady Merton (Penelope Wilton) will find much to enjoy.

While the film finds space for the whole cast, The Grand Finale is a lot less forcibly egalitarian than the first two films. This is Lady Mary’s film. Edith (Laura Carmichael) and Tom (Allen Leech) see their roles drastically reduced, the latter functioning in little more than a cameo. There’s a few touching moments for the older servants approaching the age of retirement, though the film conveniently forgets all that time spent on bed and breakfast investments from the final two seasons.

One of Fellowes’ finest achievements in the series was his portrayal of the Crawleys as quiet allies of the gay community. Series archvillain turned sympathetic hero Thomas Barrow (Robert James-Collier) struggled to accept his sexuality for much of the franchise, ultimately finding acceptance with actor Guy Dexter (Dominic West) in the previous film, resigning his role as butler of Downton. At a time when LGBTQ rights are under immense attack around the world, Fellowes finds ample beauty in his portrayal of the 1930s aristocracy as far more accepting than their modern counterparts.

Acceptance is an issue at the heart of The Grand Finale. Used to being the center of attention, Lady Mary struggles with her new outcast status as a divorcee in a world governed by tradition. Lord Grantham struggles to accept that his old world is gone. 

There is a little awkwardness to be found at the heart of the drama. Mary is exiled from London society, yet expected to take the reins of an estate from her still-living father. There is a small acknowledgement that earls are no longer treated like village kings and queens, but Fellowes crafts a story that’s pretty damning to the concept of primogeniture amidst a narrative that still upholds the idealistic nature of country estate life.

Downton Abbey has always favored soapy storylines instead of serious drama, but missing from this film is an implicit defense of Downton as an estate. The series spent most of its run defending Downton as a place of employment, something even the first film managed to squeeze in late in its runtime. Free of her occasional nastiness, Fellowes firmly establishes Mary as a figure worth championing, but is Downton itself a cause worth championing? The film leaves a lot of food for thought on that front.

The pacing is a bit off throughout much of the film. Characters blow through scenes, speaking their lines without much of a chance to breathe. The 124-minute runtime is nearly identical to the first two films, only a bit longer than the Christmas specials that bookended each season after the first. An additional ten minutes would’ve given several scenes a much-needed chance to breathe.

As a franchise, Downton Abbey started wrapping itself up all the way back in season five. With that in mind, The Grand Finale didn’t have a ton of loose ends to tie up, besides the strands of plot that came loose from the last finale. Life is messy.

Downton Abbey took some turns that were out of Fellowes’ control, cast members whose absences had immutable effects on the narrative. Like its characters, the show managed to adapt. The Grand Finale is a triumph for the franchise and all its characters we’ve grown to love. Above all else, it’s a lot of fun to spend another few hours in this delightful world.