Ian Thomas Malone

Yearly Archive: 2025

Wednesday

10

December 2025

0

COMMENTS

Frosty’s Winter Wonderland

Written by , Posted in Podcast

We are back in the Rankin/Bass cinematic universe for the first Frosty sequel, Frosty’s Winter Wonderland. Essentially just a riff on Bride of Frankenstein, the special has next to no plot. Jack Frost makes his first Rankin/Bass appearance, decidedly at odds with his next two appearances in Rudolph and Frosty’s Christmas in July and Jack Frost, but when has Rankin/Bass ever cared about continuity? Ian tries to make sense of the chaos.

This will be our final holiday episode for 2025! Be sure to check out all our other holiday episodes. Happy Holidays everyone!

Tuesday

9

December 2025

0

COMMENTS

Cricket on the Hearth

Written by , Posted in Podcast

We are back in the Rankin/Bass cinematic universe with the Cricket on the Hearth. One of the earliest specials in their canon, Cricket is a bit of a mess. The animation is somewhat solid, but the characters are a bunch of morons and the music is awful. What else is new?

This special is pretty awful and should be avoided by everyone other than Rankin/Bass completionists. No wonder it’s taken us this long to cover it! Watch at your own risk. 

Monday

8

December 2025

0

COMMENTS

Holiday Podcast Coverage featuring Rankin/Bass and the Muppets

Written by , Posted in Blog

What’s Christmas without a bunch of cringe stop-motion specials from the 70s? We at Estradiol Illusions love to spend too much time over-analyzing popular culture, especially problematic Christmas specials. The holiday season is one of our favorite times to take a pause and unpack this bizarre genre of filmmaking.

We’ve organized a collection of our holiday episodes for your easy listening pleasure. Estradiol Illusions is available wherever you get your podcasts, including Apple, Spotify, and Google. The Spotify collection has been neatly collected into a playlist. The external links are for Apple. Enjoy and Happy Holidays!

Rankin/Bass

The Year Without a Santa Claus

Rudolph: A Transgender Perspective (our first Rudolph episode, recorded before we established the house Rankin/Bass format.)

Santa Claus is Comin’ to Town 

Rudolph’s Shiny New Year

Pinocchio’s Christmas

The First Christmas: The Story of the First Christmas Snow

Nestor the Long-Eared Christmas Donkey

Jack Frost

The Lift and Adventures of Santa Claus

The Little Drummer Boy

A Miser Brother’s Christmas (technically just inspired by Rankin/Bass as a sequel to The Year Without a Santa Claus)

‘Twas the Night Before Christmas

The Little Drummer Boy, Book II

Rudolph & Frosty’s Christmas in July

Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer (our second Rudolph episode, more in line with the rest of the series)

The Leprechaun’s Christmas Gold

Frosty the Snowman

The Muppets

The Muppet Christmas Carol

It’s a Very Merry Muppet Christmas Movie

A Muppet Christmas: Letters to Santa

 

The Rest

A Charlie Brown Christmas (mostly about Ian’s breakup)

Thomas’ Snowy Surprise 

Archie Kao – Christmas at the Ranch

The Small One

Miracle on 34th Street (covers both films)

The Snowman

Monday

8

December 2025

0

COMMENTS

Frosty the Snowman

Written by , Posted in Podcast

We’re back in the Rankin/Bass cinematic universe. Ian covers the classic Frosty the Snowman, the most normal of the hand-drawn animated holiday specials. Ian unpacks Professor Hinkle’s villainy, and the beauty of Frosty’s existential musings. Hinkle’s tracking abilities don’t make a lot of sense, but at least we have a Santa Claus who isn’t completely worthless for once.

Thursday

4

December 2025

0

COMMENTS

The Leprechaun’s Christmas Gold

Written by , Posted in Podcast

Ever wonder what a St. Patrick’s Day special would look like if it suddenly became a Christmas show?

The Leprechaun’s Christmas Gold is easily the worst stop-motion Rankin/Bass Christmas special, twenty-four minutes of nonsense with practically no redeeming qualities. Ian does not recommend this show at all, but we at Estradiol Illusions are nothing if not Rankin/Bass completionists.

Watch this garbage at your own risk! We tried to do it justice on the pod. We’re sorry that any of this exists.

Tuesday

2

December 2025

0

COMMENTS

Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer

Written by , Posted in Podcast

Our Christmas coverage begins! Ian revisits the 1964 special Rudolph the Red-Nose Reindeer for an episode that’s more stylistically in line with our Rankin/Bass episodes than the first one we did in 2020.

Ian still has a lot of complex feelings about this special, namely it’s Axis of Awful (Santa, Donner, and Coach Comet). It’s definitely problematic, but there’s a reason people love this one so much.

Be sure to check out all of EI’s Rankin/Bass holiday episodes. 

EI’s original Rudolph episode: https://ianthomasmalone.podbean.com/e/rudolph-a-transgender-perspective/

Ian’s original Rudolph article: https://ianthomasmalone.com/2017/12/a-transgender-perspective-on-rudolph-the-red-nosed-reindeer/

Thursday

13

November 2025

0

COMMENTS

‘Predator: Badlands’ review: a very solid, safe entry in the long-running franchise

Written by , Posted in Blog, Movie Reviews, Pop Culture

Academic research is often described as carving a new niche between two thoroughly explored subjects. Outside of medicine, the sciences, and a few other fields, people who arrive to grad school looking to break ground in the wild west are frequently met with disappointment, instead expected to cater to the norm. Conformity takes a lot of fun out of the whole adventure.

Hollywood functions in much the same way, especially toward its long-running franchises. Filmmakers are not supposed to reinvent the wheel so much as give their audiences a slightly fresh perspective on the wheel they already know and love. Director Dan Trachtenberg found that sweet spot with 2022’s Prey, a delightfully unique perspective on the Predator franchise, quite a feat for the seventh entry in the series (counting the two Alien vs. Predator films).

After directing the animated feature Predator: Killer of Killers, which was released this past June, Trachtenberg returns for his third go-around with Predator: Badlands, a film that flips the original concept. Once the big bad, the titular Yautja are now the protagonists.

Badlands follows Dek (Dimitrius Schuster-Koloamatangi), the runt of his clan. Weakness is not exactly tolerated among predators, but Dek’s older brother Kwei (Mike Homik) shows some rare mercy toward his sibling, angering their father Njohrr (Reuben de Jong). After Kwei refuses his father’s orders to kill Dek, Njohrr executes him instead. Desperate to prove he belongs in his clan, Dek travels to the “death planet” Genna to kill the fearsome Kalisk.

Once on the inhospitable planet, Dek meets Thia (Elle Fanning), an android from the Weyland-Yutani corporation (who make all the synthetics in the Alien franchise), who’s missing her bottom half. Thia also misses her sister Tessa (also Fanning), the leader of the synth team dispatched to Genna, also hunting the Kalisk. Despite his species’ inclination for solitude, Dek teams up with the non-person to hunt his prey, dreaming of revenge against his father.

Trachtenberg frequently demonstrates his deep comprehension of the franchise. Clocking in at 107-minutes, the narrative moves briskly through its paint-by-numbers plot. The pacing is quite strong, if not a little formulaic.

 Schuster-Koloamatangi walks a fine line with Dek quite well. Badlands is the first Predator film to earn a PG-13 rating. The lack of gore and extreme violence does come with some unnecessary cutesy antics, but Dek is a relatable protagonist. The film doesn’t go for full Terminator 2 cartoonish antics for its villain-turned-lead.

Fanning is the real core of the film, carving a niche for Thia that’s quite different from the synths who have come before in previous Alien films. Found family is predictably a major theme of the narrative. Badlands has zero human characters, though the film can’t really help but filter its musings on identity through a distinctly human lens.

It’s hard not to be won over by Fanning’s relentless sense of earnestness. The film isn’t afraid to wear its emotions on its sleeve. Much like its synths, there is a perpetual sense of artificialness to the narrative’s sense of heart. Trachtenberg is moving too quickly to give his work much of a chance to breathe.

The action work is quite strong, particularly in the first two acts. Trachtenberg blends practical effects and CGI quite well. Things come a little undone in the third act. Everything is a bit too predictable. The final action sequences lack any real sense of suspense.

The film’s big issue is that Dek and Thia are both about 80% of fully fleshed out characters. They’re easy to bond with, not necessarily because of the work of the film, but because we’ve seen these types of characters before. Both actors put forth fine work, but the whole experience is a little too cookie-cutter.

Trachtenberg delivers a solid popcorn film, entertaining work that falls well short of what we know he’s capable of. One might have hoped he’d swing a little harder for the fences after the treat that was Prey. Instead, we’re left with something perfectly content to be aggressively fine. The lazy third act is essentially a metaphor for the whole film: just good enough.

Nobody necessarily expects greatness from a franchise eight films in. Prey delivered that, when no one expected it. As a series, Predator hasn’t exactly hit the high watermarks of its companion franchise, Alien, whose first two installments were directed by Ridley Scott and James Cameron at the top of their games.

 Badlands is a fun time. It’s an extremely competent film, an accolade that shouldn’t feel like an insult for a narrative that never once tried for greatness. The bar could have been raised after Prey. One can’t help but wonder why it wasn’t.

Sunday

12

October 2025

0

COMMENTS

‘Tron: Ares’ review: pathetic slop sprinkled with pretty visuals and a killer score

Written by , Posted in Blog, Movie Reviews, Pop Culture

The world of Tron is not exactly Shakespearean in nature, but Disney’s handling of its enigmatic science fiction franchise over the past forty years has been nothing shy of a tragedy. The Grid is such a delectable palette for creative storytelling, something that no filmmaker who’s touched the material has ever quite figured out. The same pattern emerges through the decades. Tron hits theaters, impresses with its visuals, bores with its plot, and makes just enough money that someone considers bringing it out of hibernation every few decades.

Tron: Ares tries to set itself apart from its predecessors, at least on the surface, with its preoccupation with the real world rather than The Grid. Fifteen years have passed since the events of Tron: Legacy. ENCOM is in a technology race with Dillinger Systems, founded by former ENCOM executive and original Tron tertiary villain Ed Dillinger. Dillinger Systems is now run by Ed’s grandson Julian (Evan Peters), who courts the military with his new Master Control Program (MCP), Ares (Jared Leto).

While Dillinger Systems and ENCOM are both capable of bringing their digital constructs into reality, essentially a reverse of the technology that sends humans to The Grid, neither can do so for longer than 29 minutes. New ENCOM CEO Eve Kim (Greta Lee) and her assistant Seth (Arturo Castro) travel to a remote Alaskan bunker once used by Kevin Flynn (Jeff Bridges) in search of the “permanence code” that would remove the 29-minute limitation.

Julian sends Ares and his second-in-command, Athena (Jodie Turner-Smith), to capture hacked ENCOM and capture Eve, in search of the permanence code. Along the way, Ares starts to develop a conscience, realizing that Dillinger Systems is the bad kind of capitalism, while ENCOM is the more benevolent corporation. Ares and Eve team up, escape the Dillinger version of the Grid, and try to learn a bit about humanity as they run around trying to evade Athena.

Ares spent about fifteen years in development, much of it as a direct sequel to Legacy, before being redeveloped around Leto’s character. The Legacy screenwriters, Edward Kitsis and Adam Horowitz, received a story credit for Ares. The finished product puts quite a bit of distance between itself and Legacy, while clinging hard to the original 1982 Tron.

Director Joachim Rønning is put in the untenable position of having to craft his own narrative that never really lets you forget it relies on Tron’s broader lore. Casual fans may not remember Dillinger much, but the constant references to the Flynn family do no favors to Ares’ bloated cast of cardboard human characters. Peters does a serviceable job as a generic evil billionaire, a bargain bin Lex Luthor.

Lee exists in this weird space where Eve is the lead human character, and basically the de facto protagonist. Ares is clearly meant to be Leto’s vehicle. Rønning provides some basic slivers of plot to try to endear his audience to Eve, but Lee is never really afforded a chance to make the character her own. It’s as if Disney realized that Legacy managed to stand upright without a particularly memorable lead performance from Garrett Hedlund as Sam Flynn, and decided that Eve similarly didn’t have to do much either.

Leto fully immerses himself in the role of a computer program desperate to be a real boy. He is a very believable soulless construct. He even has a few slivers of charm here and there, but the film suffers from an uneven point of view. This film is less Eve’s or Ares’ than a paint-by-numbers action flick capable of going through the motions, but never really making them feel alive.

Gillian Anderson is largely wasted in a supporting role as Julian’s mother Elisabeth. The rest of the supporting cast put forth an eager effort, but the film suffers from way too many characters. Turner-Smith is perhaps the one actor who seems to know this is supposed to be a Tron movie. Athena is a lot of fun.

Both Tron and Tron: Legacy suffered from uneven storytelling, requiring state-of-the-art visuals and stellar scores to carry their narratives. Rønning delivers the visuals. Ares is a beautiful sight to behold on the big screen. Nine Inch Nails put forth a superb musical effort that would almost justify Ares’ existence as an extended music video, paying homage to the ground trodden by Wendy Carlos and Daft Punk while carving out their own niche. The music is pretty much the only original thing Ares has going for it.

The film’s original sin is its preoccupation with the real world. People don’t wait decades to watch programs fight in cities. Tron’s real treasure is The Grid. Ares barely cares about The Grid.

If the screenwriters didn’t know how to tell a good story in The Grid, they’d hardly be the first. This is not a franchise known for its meaty plots. Ares had fifteen years to fix the narrative shortcomings of Legacy, a film that in spite of that gaping hole, and Hedlund’s forgettable lead performance, had plenty of things going for it. It’s frankly pathetic that this is what they came up with.

The result is indistinguishable from the AI it nominally critiques, empty slop poured into its audience’s feed trough. Rarely does a major blockbuster rely so heavily on its composers to add any semblance of creative expression to such a lifeless corpse. There are way too many scenes that drag for an action film that clocks in at just under two hours.

Even Bridges feels fairly checked out amidst the film’s finest sequence, well-executed nostalgia bait for diehards of the original Tron. There’s much more of The Dude in his performance than Flynn, which might be the right attitude to bring to this disaster. The third act is far too pleased to give its audience slivers of what would have been a far more interesting movie.

Tron has never been prestige art. Tron and Tron: Legacy are both deeply flawed narratives that succeeded due to the ample heart that went into both productions. Those films brought something new to the table. They had something to say.

Ares is often very pretty. The music is wonderful. Yet again, this franchise was let down by its screenwriters. It’s taken forty years to make three Tron movies. Maybe in another forty years, we’ll get one with a decent plot.

Friday

26

September 2025

0

COMMENTS

‘One Battle After Another’ review: Anderson’s masterpiece is a strong contender for the best film of 2025

Written by , Posted in Blog, Movie Reviews

The work of Thomas Pynchon has always captured the zeitgeist of American culture through the most absurd lens possible, blending the eloquence of writers like Vladimir Nabokov with the gonzo realism of Hunter S. Thompson. Pynchon finds calm in the chaos, a rare talent that Paul Thomas Anderson has repeatedly demonstrated throughout his extensive career, particularly in his more sprawling epics such as Magnolia and There Will Be Blood.

Anderson has adapted Pynchon before, last in 2014’s Inherent Vice, an admirable adaptation of a late-stage effort from the reclusive author. With One Battle After Another, Anderson presents a loose take on Pynchon’s 1990 novel Vineland, which focused on Nixon-era underground activists coping with the realities of Reagan’s America. The overreaches of the DEA have been replaced with ICE, a timely modern touch that doesn’t sacrifice the atmosphere that Pynchon delicately crafted.

Bob Ferguson (Leonardo DiCaprio) is a somewhat hapless member of a radical far-left group known as the French 75, which uses guerrilla tactics to liberate immigrants and bomb courthouses and politicians’ offices. Bob’s partner, Perfidia Beverly Hills (Teyana Taylor) is a natural leader among the French 75, outgoing and relentlessly committed to the cause, a dynamic that puts strain on her relationship with Bob after they have a child.

Perfidia becomes entangled with Col. Steven Lockjaw (Sean Penn), who she first captures and teases while he’s in command of an immigrant detention facility. Aroused by her handling of him, Lockjaw becomes infatuated with Perfidia, eventually sleeping with her after he catches her planting a bomb in a courthouse. Lockjaw is being courted by the Christmas Adventures Club, a secret society of powerful white supremacists who take issue with his relationship with Perfidia, who’s eventually captured by the authorities, but escapes a cozy witness protection assignment set up by Lockjaw himself.

Sixteen years later, Bob is retired from his revolutionary days. His daughter Willa (Chase Infiniti) takes after her mother, whose past as a rat was kept from her. Willa trains in karate at the dojo of Sergio St. Carlos (Benicio del Toro), a softer-spoken member of the French 75.

The film’s primary action is set into motion when the Christmas Adventures Club begins its vetting of Lockjaw, who denies ever having been in an interracial relationship. Lockjaw hires a private investigator to track down Willa, whom he suspects might be his daughter, triggering the safety protocols of the French 75. Long-retired and addicted to substance abuse, Bob struggles with the number of passwords and codes required to engage with his old group, all while trying to protect his daughter and only family.

Anderson’s great triumph is the way he crafts a sweeping odyssey rooted in an intimate crime thriller. It’s a game of cat and mouse that feels like it completely captures the rot of this decrepit nation. Everything wrong with America is somehow encapsulated between an old racist and a middle-aged leftist burnout chasing each other around a tiny West Coast sanctuary city.

DiCaprio is not known for playing bums. Bob is not a hero. He’s not smart. His charm has faded, a sad burnout, left to raise his kid after the love of his life abandoned him. Bob is hardly the driving force of One Battle After Another, but Leo never lets the audience forget why he’s still one of the few legitimate stars left in the business. He’s not playing a particularly interesting or compelling man, and yet DiCaprio still manages to put forth one of the strongest performances of his career.

After the first act, which focuses on Taylor as the center of gravity, Penn and Infiniti provide most of the film’s emotional core. Lockjaw is a despicable scumbag, but Penn works his magic in a way that almost has you feeling sorry for this pathetic nothing of a racist. Lockjaw is a thoroughly Pynchonesque creation, an ugly creature who’s nevertheless quite captivating to watch.

Flanked on all sides by A-list talent, Infiniti makes the film her own. In many ways, she’s a Gen Z rebel without a cause, her DNA full of revolutionary sympathies repressed under the tutelage of a father who desperately wants his daughter to avoid that kind of life. Anyone who’s ever felt the inherent urge to belong to something bigger than themselves can find a kindred spirit in Willa.

The cinematography is simply delicious. Director of photography Michael Bauman did a fabulous job capturing the sprawling Californian landscape. Johnny Greenwood’s score often feels like a metronome guiding Anderson’s epic.

The 162-minute runtime never drags. Perhaps more impressive is the way that Anderson never exhausts his audience through many action sequences that never really let up. There’s almost no downtime in the film. Pynchon’s work is commonly exhausting. Even his shorter works, like The Crying of Lot 49, are complex puzzles bound to tire out their readers. Somehow, Anderson channels his muse perfectly without leaving viewers completely drained in the process.

Perhaps owing to its source material’s age, but Anderson manages to make a political film that feels prescient without being overly steeped in current events. Its subjects are not politically eloquent people. ICE’s overreaches have been an issue in this country since before Vineland was first published in 1990. The film is less an indictment of Trump than a scathing rebuke of everything wrong that’s happened to this nation since Reagan announced it was morning in America, ushering in the “Greed is Good” era that’s never really gone away.

One Battle After Another isn’t just Anderson’s best work since The Master. It’s a vital demonstration of Hollywood filmmaking as legitimate art. Anderson and Pynchon’s fingerprints are all over every minute of this feature, but it feels fresh and potent.

This film is something audiences have been starving for. Anderson isn’t playing safe with right-wing snowflakes, desperate to cancel anyone who dares to call out their bigoted nonsense. Neither does he throw about masturbatory red meat to a liberal audience bound to laugh as fools like Lockjaw.

It’s all Pynchon in a nutshell. It’s crazy. You never know what’s going to happen next, or how the characters will surprise you, but it’s all crafted with such obvious love and attention to detail.

Popular culture under late-stage capitalism is all about giving its audiences less for more. Everything is more expensive, and much of it is worse. Film studios are filling their feed troughs with AI slop that no one with half a brain would enjoy. Capitalism thrives when it’s able to mildly satiate its feeble consumer base, all too content with its substance-free diet.

That’s never been Pynchon’s jam or Anderson’s. Sitting in a movie theater, watching everything play out on a big screen, One Battle After Another reminds us of this medium’s innate ability to move people when studios get out of the way, get over their own egos, and let their talent cook. Anderson’s tour de force is easily one of the best films of the year.  The famously reclusive Pynchon would never do an interview to admit it, but it’s hard to believe he’s not smiling somewhere about how beautifully his work came to life.

Monday

22

September 2025

0

COMMENTS

‘Spinal Tap II: The End Continues’ review: a meager attempt at a sequel

Written by , Posted in Blog, Movie Reviews, Pop Culture

Comedy sequels are tricky for an obvious reason. Just because something was funny once doesn’t mean it’ll be funny again. In fact, if something was already once, that’s a decent sign that it won’t be funny again. In general, the laws of diminishing returns affect comedies way more than drama.

This is Spinal Tap is one of the most beloved comedies of all time. What began as a satire of the music industry eventually took on a life of its own, with numerous reunion concerts, television appearances, and a few albums since the film’s 1984 premiere. Somewhere along the way, the lines became blurred and Spinal Tap became something of a real band, a reality that defines and plagues the follow-up film.

This is Spinal Tap was an early entry in the mockumentary genre, but the film had a real plot and a real narrative. Director Rob Reiner crafted something that felt like an actual rock documentary while never losing sight of its purpose as a comedy. Band members like David St. Hubbins (Michael McKean) and Nigel Tufnel (Christopher Guest) thought they were cool, but Reiner made clear to the audience that these people were washed-up losers. The exploration of their humanity gave the film an endearing quality that greatly added to its legacy.

Spinal Tap II: The End Continues is much more like a straight concert documentary. The film reunites the main trio, St. Hubbins, Tufnel, and Derek Smalls (Harry Shearer) in New Orleans for a reunion in New Orleans, billed as their final show. The three have drifted apart in the past few decades, each pursuing other interests. St. Hubbins scores podcast music, Tufnel runs a guitar and cheese store, and Smalls operates a Museum of Glue. None of them has much affection for each other, a puzzling dynamic that remains underexplored throughout the narrative.

Much of the film centers around Tap practicing for their reunion show, jamming in a studio, mostly sitting in chairs. It’s kind of sweet, to a certain extent, watching old friends at it again after forty years. Guest in particular retains a healthy dose of that boyish charm he brought to Tufnel.

There are a few laughs to be found in the studio, particularly when it comes time to find a new drummer, a perilous task given the fate of all their other percussionists. The stagnancy drags. It’s neither funny nor particularly interesting to watch semi-pretend musicians rehearse for a semi-pretend concert. Against all odds, Reiner managed to make an 85-minute runtime feel like three hours, a painful slog that drags its way to the finish line.

Reiner, who reprises his role as fictional director Marty Di Bergi, seems quite bored throughout the endeavor, as does Guest, who struggles to muster up enthusiasm in many scenes past the first few minutes. This is Spinal Tap was Reiner’s first directorial effort. It’s understandable why he has such obvious love for the material, but that affection doesn’t translate well onto the finished product.

Two cameos from Paul McCartney and Elton John attempt to liven things up, while also highlighting a fundamental problem of the film. At one point during the original film, David gets angry when Spinal Tap is billed lower than a puppet show at a gig at an amusement park. Spinal Tap used to be pathetic. Now, musical icons want to play with them.

Spinal Tap’s extended victory tour would be more acceptable if this film had tried to include more actual jokes. There are a couple of gags here and there, but nowhere near enough to pad out a feature-length runtime.  The improv doesn’t work at all. McCartney, in particular, looks like a deer in the headlights when it comes to humor. Elton fares a bit better in a smaller appearance.

Did the world need another Spinal Tap film? No, but the music industry has changed quite a lot since we last checked in with the band. There was ample material to make a sequel. Reiner and crew just settled for the laziest path imaginable. There is some novelty in seeing them all on the big screen again, but this was a pathetic showing from the creative crew behind some of the greatest comedies of the past forty years. Everyone deserves better.