Bill Burr: Paper Tiger Struggles To Get Past Its Flimsy #MeToo Commentary
Written by Ian Thomas Malone, Posted in Blog, Pop Culture, TV Reviews
Analysis of the #MeToo movement and subsequent “outrage culture” has become popular fodder for comedy specials. Bill Burr: Paper Tiger dedicates its first act to commentary on the nuances of feminism, intersectionality, and the nature of sexual harassment accusations. Burr clearly feels obliged to comment on this point in American culture, but he’s not very good at mining the humor out of this complicated minefield.
The presence of Dave Becky as an executive producer, who was caught up in Louis C.K.’s masturbation scandal, feels a bit out of place considering Becky’s conciliatory tone after the backlash. Burr suggests the importance of “due process” in a segment with little humor, his candor conveniently leaving out the situations where such efforts to combat sexual harassment were met with institutional pushback.
The theme of Paper Tiger is quite simple. Burr doesn’t want to hear about how life might be hard for anyone else. This dynamic is best illustrated through a bit where he talks about how a #MeToo accuser described a man “vigorously” masturbating. Burr describes this approach as the only way to achieve self-pleasure as far as he knows, comparing the alternative to something that Sting might practice. If he spent more time listening to women, he’d know that masturbation as an activity enjoyed by people of all genders can, in fact, have a rhythm described as something other than vigorous.
Sure that might sound like nitpicking, but the whole segment highlights a broader issue for the special. For all the talk of Burr wanting to “trigger” people, his most outrageous bits never feel edgy enough to pack the desired punch. He talks about wanting to drive by a woman’s rally yelling outrageous things in an effort to see people flail around in agony, struggling to contain his laughter at the imagery. Sure, “owning the libs” has become an internet meme, but the whole segment plays out like Burr actually believes he can inspire such terror with his words.
A telling moment in the special came when a heckler shouted about consent as Burr lamented the plight of women who enjoyed rough sex in the #MeToo era. Understandably, Burr was annoyed at having his rhythm disrupted, but he also reacted with indignation at the idea that people were questioning his very understanding of consent. His reaction exists in stark contrast to his opening segments, a man who doesn’t want you to think he’s a sexist pig while telling jokes that depict him as such.
He’s provocative for sure, taking aim at Stephen Hawking and Michelle Obama, occasionally earning a chuckle in the process. The jokes themselves don’t really dive deeper than surface-level humor about living with a debilitating disease like ALS or being a First Lady with ambitions beyond mere photo ops. The shock value is there for those who laugh at things they wouldn’t feel comfortable saying in public.
A good barometer for whether or not you find Paper Tiger funny is whether or not you laugh at the mere thought of a person taking offense to something you said. Such amusement can be had without a person actually running around screaming in terror at said words. An abstract “snowflake” can certainly substitute for the real thing.
Is Burr actually offensive? At times, sure, but more of in the eye-rolling “offensive uncle at Thanksgiving” vein than something people might actually be outraged by. Comedians often claim they’re on the verge of “cancellation,” as Burr himself suggests, a point instantly disproven by the very existence of the special. He says, “This is going to be my last show ever,” something that only feels edgy or amusing to people who preface every offensive thing they say with that ominous foreshadowing.
As someone who belongs to a group that Burr took aim at, there isn’t much to be offended by in the notion of being told transgender women “discard” their penises. It’s a joke that’s been told a million times that lacks any basis in the fundamental process of bottom surgery. Are we supposed to laugh at the idea of a gender-neutral bathroom on a plane when literally every bathroom aboard every plane is fitted that way?
Burr is much stronger when he turns his humor inward. He talks about his temper and his desire to deal with that anger for the sake of his child. Similarly, his bits about his wife are fairly funny, even though much of it is similarly laced in the denial of any semblance of advantage afforded to him as a straight white man.
At one point early on, Burr suggests that the #MeToo movement “had to happen.” He does seem like a fairly likable man throughout the special, an Archie Bunker-like figure trying to be a good father while struggling to process the ever-changing world around him. Undoubtedly, there are plenty of people out there in similar boats, resistant to change that might come at a cost to their own standing in the world.
Burr best illustrates the problem with Paper Tiger when he remarks that the #MeToo movement appears to be winding down, having seemingly handled the most egregious cases. If that’s the case, maybe so too should standup comedians find something else to talk about. Maybe soon, we’ll see a special dedicated to outrage for the people who are outraged about outrage culture. Hopefully it’ll be funnier than this lopsided routine.
Holy shit, did you miss the point, Ian.
Awful review. Just awful
Most of these ‘critics’ don’t have the credentials or the integrity to be critiquing stand up comedy. This is a glorified audience member review.
Comedians being offensive is nothing new, all the greats were offensive to some extent, even the ones considered “family friendly.”
Dave Chapelle’s special seemed to prime a lot of those foreign to the genre. Now they act like they aren’t phased by it even though they write an entire article on how sensitive they are, which is exactly what these pieces reflect.
“I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately.”
-George Carlin
You have as much business reviewing standup as I do naming a website entirely after myself.
https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/01e643809e7a3f3d82619e9afaf009cea23db9f351973cc2cc9c29986e7d057b.png
Oh hey! A negative review from some internet warrior about a comedian that said something they don’t like.
How unique.
Oh hey! A negative comment from some internet chud about an article that triggered them.
How unique.
Using a slightly altered version of someones very own comments as a response to it is so fucking hackey, at least type out an original response. Burr was right, feminists aren’t as smart as they think they are.
Oh hey! A negative comment about using a slightly altered version of someone else’s negative comment as a response to a previous negative comment about a negative article. How original!
Yeah a response like this indicates developmental struggles. Does typing things like this make you feel like you’re making a difference?
this review was hilarious. thank you for the laughs
Personally I thought Paper Tiger was great. How bout you take them for what they are, which is jokes. I’d love to see you attempt stand up without being the slightest bit offensive which these days is completely impossible. Why even write this piece? Honestly asking. Seems like almost everyone that’s read it so far doesn’t agree at all.
If we are to take them as “jokes” does that mean we cannot criticize the material they are based on and the implications of the societal outlook such jokes entail?
Can you take policy statements as jokes?
This is so funny. I love reading your reviews because they are so ridiculous. Saying the people the world finds the most funny… are not funny. What did you think when Chapelle got a 99% on rotten tomatoes? Why are you an authority on comedy again? As a liberal (or i thought i was a liberal) i am so disturbed by where liberalism is going and i think these comedians are the hero’s of these times because they say what the majority of people (i and all my friend are fierce Trump haters) are thinking but to afraid to say.
The appeal to popularity to establish fact is rooted in worse ridiculousness than that which you’ve accused the author. All you can say is that, at this point in time, people who self-selected to give an opinion on Dave Chappelle did so positively in this current culture. It does not establish objective fact about how the comedy is to be perceived. You can laugh at a joke while still examining its impetus and criticizing the comedian for being belligerent for belligerency’s sake.
You mean belligerent for comedy’s sake..? Lol
What a word salad about nothing
I was perusing my old emails when I chanced upon this reminder that you lack either the cognitive ability to understand or the will to engage your brain. Perchance both? In any case, how embarrassing for you that you did not comprehend the meaning of ordinary words. I suppose that your maligning of my rebuttal as drivel only allows you a means to assuage your inferiority complex. In any case, I hope one day that you stop embarrassing yourself.
Pretentious windbag.
So you offer zero objective analysis on this comedy show while spouting off about objective analysis of comedy — all while using a bunch of 10 dollar words just to call somone stupid. Good job. How predictably transparent of your ilk.
Terrible review, absolutely terrible. What a sad attempt at a hit piece.
https://media1.giphy.com/media/TL2Yr3ioe78tO/giphy.gif
Way to miss the point of Bill’s response to the heckler equating rough sex with rape….
This is why ideologues have no sense of humour, their minds are too full of politics to even understand jokes. smh
You must be fun to joke around with at the parties.
All you say is bs crap that no one except triggered, ideshshsbsbdbdbdhdhstic and narrow minded
You must be so much fun to joke around with at the parties.
All you do is put jokes into your political and social ecology, and spurt out words out of your narrow minded and shallow self.
You undermine the comedian as soon as they say one crap about feminism or whatever you think isn’t right and you become the most obsolete and narrow minded reviewer.
0/10 would not read again.
Stop reviewing Comedy if you don’t have a sense of humor.
Ian Thomas Malone You are not really good at this humor thing, I suggest a career change!
You literally missed the point, and if anything proved his. This whole review wastes its time saying that he didn’t trigger people, but the reviewer is literally triggered. Going as far as to call him an “owning the libs” person implying he’s an idiot for thinking people get that upset at words, when they do. There are thousands of videos online of people at rally’s getting angry and aggressive at people simply asking questions. If you don’t think they’d flip their shit after someone INTENTIONALLY GOES THERE WITH THE INTENT OF PISSING THEM OFF then you’re just as delusional as your review.
Don’t review comedy special, you’re what’s wrong with the industry right now.
Lol people just can’t wait to get to their keyboard when comedians are successful while mocking one of your beliefs
Lol people just can’t wait to get to their keyboards to defend comedians being criticized for their routines.
Yes, you’re just one of those outrage white women he talked at the stand-up. Your review is proving his point.
Let me guess, you thought “Nanette” was a great special?
My god you have 0 business reviewing a comedy special. I don’t think I’ve ever seen you do or say anything funny, so what do you actually know about it? Nothing. I’ve never seen a talented performance from you. Yet here you are..You ignore the millions of people who laugh and act out of your own soulless nature to justify rating comedy as weak or low brow. You take everything so seriously and try so hard to act as if you weren’t personally offended when you clearly wrote this emotionally driven reactive piece.
Pathetic, ignorant, and just as desperate for attention as they come.
TRIGGERED
Gibberish. Utterly incompetent reviewer.
You are a joyless, brainless, dickless sack of garbage.
If you want to see someone triggered, see men who feel persecuted when someone doesn’t like Bill Burr
Nice, definitely gonna get laid now!
Ugh. What comedian do you find funny? You seem to blast everyone. There was another reviewer (I don’t remember the name now) that similarly poo-pooed the very popular comedians but LOVED Tig Notaro. Are you a fan of Tig?
You can actually make money writing articles like this? Jesus christ…..
This is why bitches ain’t funny.
Follow Us On Facebook
Estradiol Illusions
Estradiol Illusions on Apple
Estradiol Illusions on Spotify
Twitter Feed
The Estradiol Illusions Podcast
Entertainment & LGBTQ Issues show hosted by Ian Thomas Malone (@ianthomasmalone)
It’s that time again! ITM makes her appeal for you to fill out a ballot. The stakes are too high, something we’re used to hearing, but the threat of another four years of Trump is simply unfathomable for our country. Too many people’s rights are on the line. The Senate map is very tough for Democrats, and every vote counts.
Please take a moment to check your voter registration status, and be sure to make plans to vote in this election. Thank you.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
Archives
Ian Thomas Malone is proudly powered by WordPress